Justificatory Reasons for Action
نویسنده
چکیده
Practical reasons play a central role in our everyday discourse about action and there is no major ethical theory into which the concept of reasons for action does not play a crucial role. However, the nature of reasons for acting is not well understood. Th e aim of the present essay is therefore to clarify the notion of justifi catory reasons for action. To accomplish this, I start, after some preliminaries, from a widely shared but oversimplifi ed model of practical reasoning. On this view, we have a reason for acting if this action is a necessary and available means to bring about one of our ends. I show that this view is mistaken. In particular, I argue that, contrary to prevailing opinion, desires do not provide an agent with justifying reasons for action. By discussing the necessary conditions for justifi catory reasons, I outline an account of practical reasons that is more sophisticated and more accurate than most theories of desire-dependent reasons, neo-Humeanism included.
منابع مشابه
Why Reasons May Not Be Causes
This paper considers Davidson’s (1963) arguments for construing reasons as causes and attempts to show that he has failed to provide positive reasons for introducing causation into his analysis of rationalizing explanation. I consider various ways of spelling out his intuition that something is missing from explanation if we consider only the justificatory relation between reasons and action, a...
متن کاملThe Justificatory Structure of OWL Ontologies
Current ontology development tools offer debugging support by presenting justifications for entailments of OWL ontologies. In many cases even a single entailment may have many distinct justifications, and justifications for distinct entailments may be critically related. We call the set of relations between multiple justifications the justificatory structure of an ontology. A restricted analysi...
متن کاملBeyond Best Interests
I. The Problem with Best Interests: A Framework; a Justificatory Idiom; and a Problem ................................. 1192 A. Framework: The Three Dimensions of State Interventions Aimed at Influencing Reproduction .............................................................. 1192 B. Justificatory Idiom: Best Interests of the Resulting Child Justifications, Their Attraction and Prominence .....
متن کاملThe Diane Pretty case and the occasional impotence of justification in ethics.
Most discussions in ethics argue that a certain practice or act is morally justified, with any underlying theory taken as supporting a guide to general action by aiding discovery of the objectively and singularly right thing to do. I suggest that this oversimplifies the agent's own experience of the moral dilemma, and I take the recent English case of Diane Pretty's request for assisted suicide...
متن کاملSeeing is believing? How reinterpreting perception as dynamic engagement alters the justificatory force of religious experience
WilliamAlston’sTheoryofAppearinghas attracted considerable attention in recent years, both for its elegant interpretation of direct realism in light of the presentational character of perceptual experience and for its central role in his defense of the justificatory force of Christian mystical experiences. There are different ways to account for presentational character, however, and in this ar...
متن کامل